What is a critical consideration for ensuring compatibility when composing applications using modules from different teams?

The critical consideration for ensuring compatibility when composing applications using modules from different teams is to enforce strict coding standards and naming conventions. When multiple teams work on different modules, having a consistent approach to coding and naming helps maintain a uniform structure across the application. This consistency facilitates easier integration, reduces the learning curve for team members when they work with different modules, and minimizes potential conflicts or ambiguities that can arise from differing implementations.

By adhering to a common set of coding standards and naming conventions, teams can ensure that their modules interact more reliably and are aligned in terms of functionality and design. Such practices promote better collaboration, clearer communication, and enhanced maintainability of the application over time. This is especially important in larger organizations or projects where multiple teams are contributing to a shared codebase.

Other factors such as dependency management, deployment timing, or database architecture are certainly important in their own right, but they focus more on operational concerns rather than the foundational aspects of compatibility in the code and structure of the modules themselves. Having strong coding standards and naming conventions serves as the backbone of effective collaboration and integration among teams.