What is the best way to address a future integration requirement for a third-party CRM on the Architecture Canvas?

Creating a placeholder bounded context or integration point to represent future integration effectively addresses the anticipated requirement for a third-party CRM on the Architecture Canvas. This approach allows for a proactive design strategy, ensuring that the architecture is flexible enough to accommodate future integrations without requiring a complete overhaul as the project progresses.

By defining a clear placeholder, architects can outline the intended interaction with the future CRM, marking boundaries and dependencies that may influence current development. This also provides clarity for the development team regarding where the future capabilities will reside, ensuring that integration points are considered in architectural decisions and can help inform system design.

Additionally, this method aids in communication among stakeholders, as it visually represents the planned evolution of the architecture, facilitating discussions around timelines and resources required for the future integration. This mitigates risks associated with late integrations, such as unexpected impacts on existing structures or workflows, offering a more adaptable strategy for architectural planning.