When composing an application using modules from different teams or providers, what is a key consideration for ensuring compatibility and maintainability?

Enforcing strict coding standards and naming conventions is crucial for ensuring compatibility and maintainability when composing applications from different teams or providers. This practice promotes consistency in how code is written and organized, making it easier for developers to understand and work with modules created by others. Clear standards help to establish a common language and framework that all team members adhere to, which is particularly important in larger teams or in projects where multiple contributors are involved.

Having agreed-upon naming conventions allows team members to intuitively grasp the purpose and function of different components, reducing the learning curve when integrating or modifying existing modules. Additionally, strict coding standards can facilitate code reviews and integration processes, as developers can more easily identify deviations from the norm and quickly spot potential issues.

On the other hand, while minimizing dependencies between modules can certainly help in terms of making individual modules more isolated and manageable, it can be impractical in collaborative environments where shared functionality is often necessary. Using a shared database across all modules could introduce tight coupling and lead to challenges in deployment and scaling, and deploying all modules to the same environment simultaneously may not be feasible or necessary for every project, especially when considering versioning and testing issues. Therefore, the emphasis on coding standards and naming conventions emerges as a foundational approach to enhance